• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
Rank and File

Rank and File

trade unionism from below

  • News
  • Support
  • Subscribe
    • About
    • Contribute
    • Contact Us
Close
  • About
  • Contribute
  • Contact Us

Unifor local 222 opposes Unifor’s split from the CLC

2/8/2018

Ford Oakville worker expressing his opinion about the contract.
Ford Oakville worker expressing his opinion about the contract.

By James Napier

The membership of Unifor Local 222 has issued a stunning rebuke to Unifor National President Jerry Dias.

At the Local 222 general membership meeting on February 1, two motions were passed that opposed the sudden, destructive action taken by Dias on January 16, to pull Unifor out of the house of labour. The Canadian labour movement has been in turmoil since, with the Unifor staff trying desperately to raid hotel workers belonging to UNITE HERE Local 75 (with limited success). The incredible momentum that had been built in support of Tim Hortons workers has suffered a setback. Meanwhile, a few top union officials have given up any pretence of principle and are scrambling to hold on to their 6 figure salaries.

The Local 222 motions are based on solid, working class principles. The first motion called on Dias to reverse the disaffiliation:

As members of Unifor Local 222 we are disappointed that you have taken the action of disaffiliating our union from Canada’s central labour body, the Canadian Labour Congress. While you obtained the endorsement of the National Executive Board for this drastic step, there was no advance notice to the broader members or local leaders of Unifor. As a result, the NEB endorsed your request before they had a chance to hear any of the views of our members.

The second motion endorsed an appeal (in the terminology of the Unifor Constitution, a ‘request for review’) of the NEB decision, because Dias had “violated the democratic rights of Unifor members in several ways”.

The two motions can be read in full here:

Local 222 letter to Jerry Dias against disaffiliation

Local 222 Request for Review of Decision (Appeal against Disaffiliation)

Local 222 has great historical importance. The April 1937 strike by GM workers in Oshawa was the impetus for the establishment of industrial unionism in Canada. In 1970, the Local 222 Women’s Committee led the fight against separate seniority rights for men and women workers that resulted in major improvements in the Ontario Human Rights Code, and the banning of such discrimination. Local 222 has now taken a courageous stand against the undemocratic actions of Jerry Dias and his entourage. Other Unifor locals should follow this lead.

Union principles or self-interest?

When Unifor announced they were no longer affiliated to the CLC and would no longer be paying their dues, it called into question the status of Unifor members who had been elected to leadership positions on the CLC Executive, on provincial Federations of Labour, and on local Labour Councils. Hassan Yussuff, for example, had been elected President of the CLC as a Unifor member – in fact Jerry Dias probably spent a million dollars bussing in people to vote for him. Under the CLC Constitution, Hassan Yussuff has no legitimacy to hold office and should step down immediately. He has been sending letters to other Unifor members holding office – such as this one sent to CLC Vice-President Dan Browne, who was elected to represent young workers:

“Dear Brother Browne: Due to the decision of your national union, Unifor, to disaffiliate from the Canadian Labour Congress (CLC), we regret to inform you that you cannot continue to serve as a Vice-President on the CLC Canadian Council.”

And then, reaching new depths of hypocrisy, Yussuff announced that he could continue collecting his President’s salary because he had obtained a membership card from the PSAC. Ordinary workers, whose dues fund the offices and 6 figure salaries of Hassan Yussuff and Jerry Dias, must be furious. The average wage of a Unifor member is $23.78 an hour, or under $50,000 a year. We can no longer tolerate union executives who are more focussed on enriching themselves than on working to improve the lives of workers.

This was first published on the Unifor Solidarity Network website. 

Share this...
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Pin on Pinterest
Pinterest
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin

By admin

Categories // CLC, Unifor

Tags // featured

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Chris white says

    2/10/2018 at 4:08 pm

    UNIFAKES…

  2. John Ashton says

    8/16/2018 at 8:11 pm

    Which “Public Review Board” is this? Is a body of the Ontario gov’t?

  3. Gary Longworth says

    8/17/2018 at 11:09 am

    Why as a unifor worker making just $16 hr and unifor staff is making that kind of money. We are paying for this they are throwing money around like it’s not there’s wait it’s not it’s our .when you have a company vote for a new chair person its is fixed also .when we complain nothing is done. So why have a vote if you are picking the puppet to run your show. You say unifor worker are making $23hr not here .do you pick and choose what companies to fight for because it wasn’t our .I have a lot to say about being fair but you have to let us make a appointment so we can talk. We have a long list of people who are unhappy you should talk to us the people only making $16hr thanks

  4. Roger Crowther says

    8/17/2018 at 1:10 pm

    The public review board is an independent body overseeing UNIFOR decisions It is provided for in UNIFOR’s Constitution CAW had the same provision.

Support rankandfile.ca

RankandFile.ca is committed to building a network of rank-and-file labour activists across the country. We believe sharing stories, experiences, debate, and analysis around our collective struggles strengthens our movement and builds solidarity.

Donate now

Join our
mailing list

  • Find us onTwitter
  • Find us onFacebook
  • Find us onInstagram

Rand and File logo
Copyright © Rank and File, 2022. All rights reserved.